Shared Veneration

St. Tikhon is the rare modern saint venerated identically — under the same title, on the same days — by the Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia, the Moscow Patriarchate, and the Orthodox Church in America. Each tradition holds him on the strength of a different claim: the émigré confessor-symbol, the restorer of the patriarchate, the apostle of American Orthodoxy. After the 2007 reconciliation he has become a natural figure of unity, his name carried by institutions on three continents and his relics enshrined at the Donskoy Monastery.

Tradition: Russian Orthodox (glorified 1989)

The Rare Shared Saint

Most saints of the twentieth-century Russian Church are claimed unevenly across the jurisdictions that fractured after 1917 — glorified by one body years before another, or honored with differing titles that encode old disputes (the Royal Martyrs are the standard example: martyrs in ROCOR’s 1981 act, passion-bearers in Moscow’s 2000 act; see New Martyrs file). St. Tikhon is the exception. ROCOR glorified him in 1981 and Moscow in 1989 (see 1981 and 1989), both under the single title confessor, and the Orthodox Church in America — which traces its own institutional descent directly to his American episcopate — venerates him no less. He is a saint on whom the three estranged branches of the Russian tradition never disagreed.

The contrast with the Royal Martyrs sharpens the point. There the two acts of glorification chose deliberately different categories, and the difference “reflects distinct judgments about the character of their deaths” that persist in the two traditions’ liturgical books (New Martyrs file). With Tikhon there is no such fork. The same title, the same overlapping feast-days, the same hymnography drawn from his confessor’s witness — the agreement is total, and it is total because the figure himself sits before the divisions. He was patriarch before the 1927 Declaration that split the Church; his canonical authority was never in question on either side of the emigration; and his American labors made him, additionally, the common father of a third body. Few saints occupy so unencumbered a place in a tradition otherwise so marked by its twentieth-century quarrels.

Three Claims on One Saint

What makes the shared veneration more than a coincidence of calendars is that each tradition venerates a genuinely different aspect of the same man.

For ROCOR he is the émigré confessor-symbol: the last freely-elected canonical patriarch, who anathematized the persecutors and never withdrew it, whose witness the free Church abroad existed to proclaim when the Church inside Russia was silenced. His 1981 glorification among the New Martyrs was, for ROCOR, the act by which it spoke for the whole suffering Russian Church (ROCOR, Act of Glorification, 1981).

For the Moscow Patriarchate he is the restorer of the patriarchate — elected by lot at the Local Council of 1917–18 to the throne left vacant since Peter the Great, and the first hierarch of the Soviet era the patriarchate was able to canonize, in 1989, on the four-hundredth anniversary of the patriarchate he had restored (see 1981 and 1989). Moscow venerates him as the bridge between the old patriarchal Church and the New-Martyr host whose great glorification in 2000 his canonization opened (Post-Soviet Revival).

For the OCA he is the apostle of American Orthodoxy — “Enlightener of North America,” the missionary bishop of 1898–1907 who organized the multi-ethnic American diocese from which the OCA descends, blessed the founding of the first American Orthodox monastery, and fostered English-language worship (OCA, “Glorification of Saint Tikhon, Apostle to America”; see Pastoral Teaching). The OCA keeps him as the father of its own existence; it was Tikhon’s plan for a self-governing American church, conceived during his episcopate, that the OCA understood itself to be fulfilling when it received autocephaly from Moscow in 1970, and his name stands at the head of its own list of glorified hierarchs.

The Saint of the Reconciliation Era

These three claims, once held apart, now converge. After the Act of Canonical Communion of May 17, 2007 reunited ROCOR with the Moscow Patriarchate (2007 Reunion), a saint venerated identically by both bodies — and by the American church that had received autocephaly from Moscow in 1970 — became a ready emblem of restored unity. The reconciliation-era Church uses St. Tikhon as exactly that: the canonical patriarch whose legitimacy neither side ever contested, whose confessor’s witness rebukes the Sergianist compromise that had divided them, and whose American mission ties the émigré, the patriarchal, and the American branches to a common root. He is the saint each could honor without conceding anything to the others’ grievances — and therefore the saint around whom they could meet.

The fittingness runs deeper than convenience. The 2007 reunion was made possible, on the Moscow side, precisely by the patriarchate’s own glorification of the New Martyrs — the act by which it publicly honored those who had resisted the Soviet state, and so distanced itself from the Sergianist accommodation that had been ROCOR’s chief grievance (2007 Reunion; Post-Soviet Revival). Tikhon stands at the head of that glorified host: his 1989 canonization was the first of the series, and his witness — pre-Sergian, free, unrescinded — is the measure the whole series vindicates. To venerate him together was therefore not a sentimental gesture appended to the reunion but a recognition of the very ground on which the reunion stood. The Act of Canonical Communion was itself signed in the rebuilt Cathedral of Christ the Savior in Moscow, in a Church that had publicly owned its martyrs; Tikhon is the patriarch in whom that owning began.

It is worth adding what the shared veneration does not erase. ROCOR and Moscow still differ over the meaning of Tikhon’s final years — over how to weigh the 1923 loyalty declaration and the contested 1925 “Testament” (see The Testament Question and Epistles of the Patriarchate). But because both traditions glorified him as a confessor — honoring the witness rather than ruling on the duress documents — the disagreement over the texts does not touch the veneration of the man. The shared saint is shared precisely because the title both chose points to what united them: the suffering, not the concessions.

Institutions Worldwide

St. Tikhon’s name is carried by foundations on three continents, several of which he himself begot:

  • St. Tikhon’s Monastery, South Canaan, Pennsylvania (founded 1905 with his blessing) — the oldest Orthodox monastery in North America — and its attached St. Tikhon’s Orthodox Theological Seminary, one of the OCA’s three seminaries (OrthodoxWiki, “St. Tikhon’s Orthodox Monastery”; sttikhonsmonastery.org). The Pennsylvania monastery is the chief American center of his veneration; see Pastoral Teaching.
  • St. Tikhon’s Orthodox University of the Humanities (PSTGU) in Moscow — founded as theological-catechetical courses in 1991/92 under the patronage of Patriarch Alexei II and named for him; now one of the largest Orthodox universities in the world, with the recovery and study of the New-Martyr archives among its central works (Post-Soviet Revival, which records “the Orthodox University of St. Tikhon in Moscow (established 1992)”; Wikipedia, “Saint Tikhon’s Orthodox University”).
  • Parishes dedicated to him across the OCA, ROCOR, and the Moscow Patriarchate’s worldwide jurisdiction, a fruit of his shared veneration — among them parishes named for “St. Tikhon the Confessor” in North America and Europe that draw, in a single dedication, on all three of the claims described above.

The pattern of these foundations is itself a map of the shared veneration. The Pennsylvania monastery and seminary embody the American claim; the Moscow university embodies the patriarchal claim, devoting itself precisely to the recovery of the New-Martyr record over which ROCOR and Moscow had long divided; and the parishes scattered across the jurisdictions embody the simple fact that ordinary believers in all three traditions pray to the same saint. No comparable network attaches to the more contested figures of the period, and that is the point: institutions are built around saints a community can hold without reservation.

The Donskoy Commemorations

The physical center of his veneration is the Donskoy Monastery in Moscow, where he spent his last years under confinement and where he was buried in the small (winter) church in 1925. For nearly seventy years his relics were believed lost; on February 19/22, 1992, they were discovered hidden beneath the floor of the small cathedral and found to be almost entirely incorrupt (OCA, “Finding of the Relics of Saint Tikhon of Moscow” and “The Recovery of St. Tikhon’s Relics in February 1992”; see also New Martyrs file). On April 5, 1992, fifty bishops solemnly translated the relics to the great cathedral (Katholikon) of the Donskoy Monastery, where they now rest in a place of honor and where the principal commemorations of the saint are kept.

The discovery had a resonance beyond the relics themselves. It came in the first months after the dissolution of the Soviet Union, only weeks after the state that had hounded Tikhon ceased to exist; that his body should be found whole and incorrupt in the very monastery of his confinement, at exactly that hinge of history, was received across the jurisdictions as a sign — the persecuted patriarch given back to a Church emerging from persecution (Post-Soviet Revival; OCA, “The Recovery of St. Tikhon’s Relics”). The Donskoy Monastery, where Tikhon had lived under guard, celebrated the Liturgy through the years of his confinement, and been buried, thus became the natural center of his cult, gathering into one place the whole arc of his witness: the place of his suffering became the place of his glory. The Finding of the Relics (February 9/22) has itself become a feast, joining the repose (March 25 / April 7), the glorification (September 26 / October 9), and the election (November 5/18) catalogued in 1981 and 1989. The Donskoy shrine, drawing pilgrims from all three jurisdictions, is the place where the shared veneration of St. Tikhon is made visible.

See Also

References

  • Orthodox Church in America. “Glorification of Saint Tikhon, Apostle to America”; “Finding of the Relics of Saint Tikhon of Moscow”; “The Recovery of St. Tikhon’s Relics in February 1992.” oca.org.
  • “St. Tikhon’s Orthodox Monastery (South Canaan, Pennsylvania).” OrthodoxWiki; sttikhonsmonastery.org, “Founding of the Monastery.”
  • “Saint Tikhon’s Orthodox University.” Wikipedia (PSTGU founding 1991/92, used to locate; cross-checked against the repo’s Post-Soviet Revival file).
  • “St. Tikhon of New York and Moscow.” American Carpatho-Russian Orthodox Diocese of North America (acrod.org).
  • “Patriarch Tikhon’s Relics Discovered.” The Archives of Orthodox America (roca.org).
  • The Act of Canonical Communion between the Moscow Patriarchate and the Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia, May 17, 2007.
  • ROCOR Council of Bishops. Act of Glorification of the New Martyrs and Confessors of Russia. New York, 1981.