The Eschatology and Visions

The most influential single part of the Life: the long apocalyptic prophecy Andrew delivers to Epiphanios about the end of the world — the Apocalypse of Andrew Salos — with its sequence of last emperors, tribulations, the coming of Antichrist, and the final consummation, together with the Life‘s visions of paradise and the other world. This file describes the eschatological content and its outsized afterlife, read as the apocalyptic imagination the text carries under Andrew’s name.

Tradition: Byzantine (Constantinopolitan)

The Apocalypse Within the Life

Near the end of the Life, in answer to Epiphanios’s questions about the last things — “when will the end of the world be, and by what signs?” — Andrew delivers a long prophecy of the end (Nikephoros, Life of St Andrew the Fool, ed. and trans. Lennart Rydén, Studia Byzantina Upsaliensia 4, Uppsala, 1995, vol. 2, the eschatological dialogue). This section, the so-called Apocalypse of Andrew Salos, is among the most important pieces of Byzantine apocalyptic literature; it circulated independently of the Life and had an afterlife of its own, especially among the Slavs (Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium, s.v. “Andreas Salos, Apocalypse of”; Ivanov, Holy Fools in Byzantium and Beyond, trans. Franklin, Oxford, 2006, on the apocalypse’s independent circulation). Whatever the Life‘s date, the apocalypse belongs to the broad Byzantine tradition of political-eschatological prophecy that runs from the seventh-century Apocalypse of Pseudo-Methodius onward, and it is one of that tradition’s classic Byzantine expressions.

The Content of the Prophecy

The prophecy follows the shape characteristic of Byzantine apocalyptic. Andrew foretells a sequence of reigns and calamities leading toward the end: a period of prosperity and then of decline and moral collapse; the rise and fall of emperors, culminating in the figure of a final righteous emperor whose reign precedes the last crisis; wars, upheavals, and the loosing of the peoples; and then the appearance of Antichrist, the last deceiver, with his persecution and his false wonders; the sun darkened and the signs in heaven; and finally the Second Coming of Christ, the resurrection, and the judgment (Nikephoros, Life, ed. Rydén 1995, vol. 2, the apocalyptic section; on the shape of Byzantine apocalyptic prophecy, see the discussion in the scholarship on the Apocalypse of Andreas Salos and its relation to the Pseudo-Methodian tradition). The prophecy is cast, as such texts are, as a vision of the whole arc of history from the seer’s present to the end — history read as a countdown.

Two features are worth marking. First, the eschatology is entwined with the political theology of empire typical of Byzantine apocalyptic: the fate of the world is narrated through the fate of the Christian basileia and its emperors, and the figure of the last emperor — who lays down his crown at the end — is a fixture the Life shares with the wider tradition (on the last-emperor motif in Byzantine apocalyptic; standard scholarship). Second, the prophecy is consolatory as much as fearful: it assures the faithful that history is in God’s hands, that the tribulations are numbered, and that the end is the coming of Christ, not the triumph of evil (Ivanov, Holy Fools, 2006, on the function of the apocalypse). It is prophecy in the biblical mode — meant to fortify the faithful for endurance, not to fuel date-setting.

The Visions of the Other World

Alongside the end-times prophecy, the Life contains visions of the spatial other world — the heavenly places and the state of souls. Andrew is described as being caught up and led through paradise, shown its beauty and its inhabitants, and granted sight of the spiritual realities ordinarily hidden: the warfare of angels and demons over human souls, the fate of the departed, the workings of divine providence (Nikephoros, Life, ed. Rydén 1995, vol. 2, the visionary passages; see Asceticism and the Hidden Life). These visions belong to the rich Byzantine literature of otherworld journeys and complement the temporal apocalypse: where the apocalypse maps the end of history, the paradise-visions map the structure of the unseen world that stands behind it. Together they make the Life a compendium of the Byzantine religious imagination of the beyond.

The Afterlife of the Apocalypse

The apocalyptic section’s influence far outran the biographical frame. It circulated as a text in its own right, was copied and excerpted, and — crucially — was translated into Slavonic and absorbed into the Slavic apocalyptic tradition, where end-times expectation had a long and vivid life (Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium, s.v. “Andreas Salos, Apocalypse of”; Ivanov, Holy Fools, 2006, on the Slavic reception). In this the Apocalypse of Andrew Salos parallels the Life‘s other great export, the Blachernae vision: both were pieces of a Byzantine text that found their fullest reception among the Slavs (see Andrew in Byzantium and Among the Slavs). The fool’s Life thus fed the Slavic world in two directions at once — a feast of protection and a prophecy of the end.

Reading the Eschatology Rightly

Per the repository methodology, this material is read as the apocalyptic and visionary content the Life carries under Andrew’s name, not as revelations of a historical seer (METHODOLOGY §3.5; see Methodology). Two cautions follow. First, the prophecy is not a coded timetable of datable events; it is apocalyptic literature in a well-established Byzantine genre, and to mine it for predictions of specific modern events is to misread its kind — a temptation the tradition itself, with its “of that day and hour knoweth no man” (Matthew 24:36), warns against. Second, the value of the eschatology lies where the tradition places all such texts: in its summons to vigilance, repentance, and hope in the returning Christ, not in the satisfaction of curiosity about the timetable of the end. Read that way — as a text that carries the Church’s expectation of the End and its confidence in providence — the Apocalypse of Andrew Salos takes its place as one of the significant witnesses to how Byzantium, and after it the Slavic world, imagined and endured the prospect of history’s close.

See Also

References

  • Nikephoros (attrib.). The Life of St Andrew the Fool. Ed. and trans. Lennart Rydén. 2 vols. Studia Byzantina Upsaliensia 4. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, 1995. (The eschatological dialogue; the last emperor, Antichrist, and the end; the visions of paradise and the spiritual world.)
  • Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium. Ed. Alexander Kazhdan et al. New York: Oxford University Press, 1991. S.v. “Andreas Salos, Apocalypse of.” (The independent circulation and influence of the apocalyptic section.)
  • Ivanov, Sergey A. Holy Fools in Byzantium and Beyond. Trans. Simon Franklin. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006. (The apocalypse within the Life; its function and Slavic reception.)
  • Scripture: Matthew 24 (the eschatological discourse; “of that day and hour knoweth no man,” 24:36).
  • METHODOLOGY.md §3.5, this repository.