07 — The Name-of-God Controversy (Imiaslavie)
The collection’s dispute flagship. Ilarion’s On the Mountains of the Caucasus (1907) and the confession “the Name of God is God Himself”; the Athonite quarrel of 1912–13; the condemnations of Constantinople and the Russian Synod; the forcible removal of over eight hundred monks in July 1913; the 1914 mitigation; the unfinished review at the Moscow Council of 1917–18; the sympathies of Florensky, Bulgakov, and Losev — with the dogmatic question left where the Church left it: formally unresolved.
Tradition: Russian Orthodox / Athonite (intra-Orthodox dispute, formally unresolved)
This section is written under the strictest application of METHODOLOGY §4.2: an intra-Orthodox dispute the Church herself has not settled. Both parties’ positions are reported in their own terms with proponents named; contested figures are attributed to their sources (Alfeyev’s tallies); the synodal condemnation, its administrative mitigation, and the adjourned conciliar review are stated as the exact juridical record; and neither reading is adjudicated.
Files in This Section
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| the-athonite-dispute-1912-1913.md | The book, the quarrel on Athos, Bulatovich’s Apologia, the patriarchal and Synodal condemnations (Epistle of 18 May 1913), the deportations of July 1913, and what was and was not decided. |
| the-unfinished-question.md | The 1914 mitigation; the 1917–18 Council’s adjourned review; Florensky, Bulgakov, Losev; the two readings stated fairly with proponents named; the question’s present status and why it belongs in this compendium. |
See Also
- 02 — The Theology of the Name — the theology the dispute stress-tested
- 04 — Athos and the Hesychast Method — the Palamite doctrine both parties claimed
- Master README — the whole guide