The Relics and Metekhi
Georgian tradition venerates St. Shushanik’s relics in the Metekhi church of the Dormition in Tbilisi, above the Mtkvari river — and the received account of how they got there (“in 578, with the blessing of Catholicos Kirion I”) is internally impossible as stated, since Kyrion’s catholicosate is dated a generation later. This file gives the relic tradition the honest §3.5 treatment: what the fifth-century source attests (burial at Tsurtavi), what the translation tradition claims and when it is attested, why the schism-era logic of a transfer is historically plausible, and what remains simply uncertain.
Tradition: Georgian Orthodox (shared pre-division veneration with the Armenian Apostolic Church)
What the Earliest Source Attests: Tsurtavi
The Martyrdom ends where fifth-century evidence ends: Shushanik was buried with honor at Tsurtavi, the place of her passion, by the clergy and people of the march (Jakob Tsurtaveli, Martyrdom of the Holy Queen Shushanik, trans. Lang, Lives and Legends of the Georgian Saints, 1976; the Armenian menologion notice: “buried with honor in the land of Georgia” — Passion, trans. Maksoudian, 1997). Her grave there was the natural seed of the local cult the previous file established (see Veneration and the Political Sequel). Beyond this, the fifth century is silent: no early source describes the tomb, its furnishings, or any translation.
The Received Tradition: Translation to Metekhi
The Georgian Church’s living tradition holds that the martyr’s relics were translated from Tsurtavi to Tbilisi and rest today in the Metekhi church of the Dormition of the Theotokos — the landmark church on the rock above the Mtkvari (Kura), opposite the old city — where her shrine is venerated beside the altar (Machitadze, The Lives of the Georgian Saints, 2006, whose account is carried in English by pravoslavie.ru and the OCA lives: “St. Shushanik’s holy relics were translated to Tbilisi, where they remain today, in the Metekhi Church of the Most Holy Theotokos”). The received account attaches a date and an authority: the translation was made “in 578, with the blessing of Catholicos Kirion I” (ibid.).
Here the repository’s method requires a firm note, because the received statement cannot be correct as it stands.
[Disputed/Corrected: the date and auspices of the Metekhi translation. The received Life’s “578 under Catholicos Kirion I” is internally inconsistent: Kyrion (Kirion) I’s tenure as catholicos of Kartli is dated by the scholarship to c. 599–614/616 — he is precisely the Kyrion of the Armenian–Georgian schism, against whom the Third Council of Dvin acted c. 607–610 (Garsoïan, L’Église arménienne, 1999; Loosley Leeming, Medieval Worlds 10, 2019, 63–64; see One Church before the Division). Either the year is corrupt (a 578 for a date in the 600s), or the catholicos is (a different, earlier hierarch’s name lost behind the famous one), or the whole notice is a later harmonization. The underlying tradition — that the relics were moved from Tsurtavi to Tbilisi around the time of the schism — has a coherent historical logic: with the ecclesial division of c. 607–610, Tsurtavi and lower Gugark passed into the Armenian (non-Chalcedonian) sphere, and the Chalcedonian church of Kartli had every motive to secure its great martyr’s relics within its own jurisdiction; Kyrion, the protagonist of the break, is exactly the figure to whom such a translation would attach. But the earliest attestation of the Metekhi association available to this collection is medieval-to-modern Georgian church tradition as codified in the received Lives, not a contemporary document, and the collection has not been able to pin the notice to a dated early source. Per §3.5 it is reported as the Church’s tradition, with its chronological difficulty stated, not asserted as documented sixth- or seventh-century fact.]
This disposition should not be read as skepticism for its own sake. Relic translations of precisely this kind — a border shrine evacuated across a new confessional line — are well-paralleled in the period, and the tradition’s core (relics moved from Tsurtavi to Tbilisi in the schism era) is the kind of institutional memory churches do preserve. What the method refuses is only the false precision of “578, under Kyrion I,” which the tradition’s own names and dates contradict.
Metekhi Itself
The present Metekhi church compounds the chronological layering, and honesty requires distinguishing the site from the building. Georgian tradition associates the Metekhi rock with the city’s earliest Christian history — including the tradition that Vakhtang Gorgasali’s refounded Tbilisi grew around it (see St. Vakhtang Gorgasali, and his collection’s treatment of the Tbilisi foundation traditions) — but the standing church is a thirteenth-century royal foundation, built under King Demetre II (r. 1270s–1289) after the Mongol destructions, and restored repeatedly since; it served as a theater and museum under Soviet rule and was returned to worship in the late twentieth century (Rayfield, Edge of Empires, 2012, on Demetre II’s era; the building history is standard in the architectural literature of Tbilisi). The shrine of St. Shushanik venerated in the church today — on the south side, by the sanctuary, as the pilgrim tradition locates it — is therefore a medieval and modern liturgical setting for a relic tradition older than the building [Disputed: the continuity of the relics through Tbilisi’s many sacks — Persian, Khwarazmian, Mongol, Timurid, and the catastrophic Persian sack of 1795 — is affirmed by the Church’s tradition and cannot be independently documented stage by stage; the collection reports the tradition as such]. None of this is peculiar to Shushanik: it is the normal condition of relic-shrines in a city burned as often as Tbilisi, and the Church’s veneration does not rest on archival continuity (see the theological note below).
Tsurtavi After the Relics
Of Tsurtavi itself — the passion’s actual ground — little remains above the soil; the site, in the Kvemo Kartli borderlands, has been the object of Georgian archaeological and church attention, and the see of Tsurtavi has been revived as a titular bishopric in the modern Georgian Church [Disputed: the identification and state of the ancient site are matters of ongoing Georgian scholarship; this collection makes no claim beyond the region’s location south of Tbilisi — Toumanoff, Studies, 1963, for the historical geography of Gugark]. The displacement of the cult’s center from the martyr’s ground to the capital — Tsurtavi to Metekhi — is itself a historical datum: it maps the seventh-century redrawing of the Caucasus’s ecclesial geography onto the body of its first martyr-saint (Garsoïan, L’Église arménienne, 1999; Loosley Leeming, Medieval Worlds 10, 2019; see A Saint of the Undivided Caucasus).
What the Church Claims in Venerating the Shrine
A closing theological note, in the repository’s settled pattern (cf. the Xenia flagship, Hagiography vs History: Methodology). When the Georgian Church venerates St. Shushanik at Metekhi, it is not certifying an unbroken chain of custody from 475; it is continuing a veneration — of the saint, at the shrine the tradition assigns her — that is itself the Church’s testimony. The relic tradition’s uncertainties are questions of history, governed by §4.2 and reported above with their difficulties intact; the veneration is an act of the Church, governed by her own reception of the martyr, which no gap in the documentation touches. The historian can say: burial at Tsurtavi is fifth-century fact; the Metekhi translation is the Church’s tradition, plausibly rooted in the schism era, imprecisely transmitted. The Church says: here we honor the queen who would not deny Christ. Both statements are true in their orders, and this collection keeps them in their proper relation (METHODOLOGY §3.5, §4.1).
See Also
- Veneration and the Political Sequel — the first cult at Tsurtavi
- One Church before the Division — the schism that redrew the cult’s geography
- Feasts and Calendars — the liturgical commemoration at the shrine and beyond
- Hagiography vs History: the Xenia model — the repository’s flagship treatment of cult vs. documentation
References
- Jakob Tsurtaveli. The Martyrdom of the Holy Queen Shushanik (c. 476–483). Condensed English trans. in D. M. Lang, Lives and Legends of the Georgian Saints. London: Allen & Unwin, 1956; 2nd rev. ed. London: Mowbrays, 1976. (The burial at Tsurtavi — the fifth-century terminus of the relic evidence.)
- The Passion of Saint Shushanik (Armenian version), trans. Krikor Maksoudian, 1997; online at attalus.org/armenian. (“Buried with honor in the land of Georgia.”)
- Machitadze, Archpriest Zakaria. The Lives of the Georgian Saints. Platina, CA: St. Herman of Alaska Brotherhood, 2006; English text as carried by pravoslavie.ru and the OCA lives. (The received translation notice: “in 578, with the blessing of Catholicos Kirion I… in the Metekhi Church of the Most Holy Theotokos.”)
- Garsoïan, Nina. L’Église arménienne et le grand schisme d’Orient. Louvain: Peeters, 1999. (Kyrion’s dates and the schism dossier — the basis of the correction.)
- Loosley Leeming, Emma. “Creating an ‘Orthodox’ Past.” Medieval Worlds 10 (2019): 61–71. (The c. 607–610 break; Tsurtavi’s jurisdictional geography.)
- Toumanoff, Cyril. Studies in Christian Caucasian History. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 1963. (The historical geography of Gugark and Tsurtavi.)
- Rayfield, Donald. Edge of Empires: A History of Georgia. London: Reaktion, 2012. (Demetre II and thirteenth-century Tbilisi; the city’s destructions.)
- METHODOLOGY.md §3.5, §4.1–4.2, this repository. (Attestation-pinning; the cult/documentation distinction.)