08 — The Optina Connection

The channel by which the hesychast revival St. Paisius reconstituted in Moldavia passed into the Russian Empire and, above all, into Optina Pustyn — the monastery whose starchestvo became the most visible nineteenth-century fruit of the Paisian recovery. These files trace two movements: the broad fanning-out of Paisian-trained monks and Paisian texts across dozens of Russian monasteries, and the specific, documented (but often romanticized) genealogy that runs from Paisius through the elder Theodore of Svir and the elder Cleopa to St. Leonid (Lev) and St. Macarius of Optina, and outward to St. Theophan the Recluse and St. Ignatius Brianchaninov.

Tradition: Pan-Orthodox / Russian-Moldavian (hesychast; Philokalic revival)

St. Paisius never returned to the Russian Empire after he left it as a young man; he died at Neamț in Moldavia in 1794. Yet within a generation the tradition he had reassembled on Athos and in the Moldavian communities — the unceasing Jesus Prayer, the disclosure of thoughts under an experienced father, the corrected Slavonic ascetic corpus, and the ideal of cenobitic life governed by eldership — was at work in Russian monasteries from the northern lakes to the Bryansk forests. This section asks how that happened, and it asks it soberly. The transmission was carried partly by named disciples whose movements can be documented and partly by books that traveled faster and farther than any man; it was reinforced by hierarchs and obscured, in later retellings, by a hagiographic impulse to draw a single clean line from the Moldavian elder to the Optina cell. The two files distinguish what can be documented from what the literature has at times overstated, and they hand the Optina-publishing and eldership material on to the collections devoted to the Optina elders themselves.

Files in This Section

File Description
Disciples Carry the Revival to Russia How monks formed at Neamț or trained in the Paisian tradition spread across the Russian Empire after (and during) Paisius’s life, carrying the Jesus Prayer, the disclosure of thoughts, and the Slavonic Dobrotolyubie into Russian monasteries; named lines — Theodore of Svir, the elder Cleopa, and the spread to Valaam, Solovetsky, Sanaksar, the Roslavl forests, and the Bryansk area; and a sober treatment of the “hundreds of monasteries” claim.
The Line to the Optina Elders The direct genealogy from Paisius to Optina Pustyn and the founding of its starchestvo: the links through Theodore of Svir and Cleopa to St. Leonid (Lev) and St. Macarius of Optina, the Optina patristic publishing project (with Ivan Kireevsky), the flowering down to St. Ambrose, and the parallel lines to St. Theophan the Recluse and St. Ignatius Brianchaninov — with a source-critical assessment of how direct the line really was.

See Also

References

  • Chetverikov, Sergius (Sergei). Starets Paisii Velichkovskii: His Life, Teachings, and Influence on Orthodox Monasticism. Trans. Vasily Lickwar and Alexander I. Lisenko. Belmont, MA: Nordland, 1980. (The standard biography; the dispersal of Paisius’s disciples into Russia and the transmission to Optina.)
  • Ware, Kallistos. The Philokalia, vol. 1, introduction. Trans. and ed. G. E. H. Palmer, Philip Sherrard, and Kallistos Ware. London: Faber and Faber, 1979. (Paisius’s place at the head of the Philokalic revival and the diffusion of the Dobrotolyubie in Russia.)
  • Meyendorff, John. St Gregory Palamas and Orthodox Spirituality. Crestwood, NY: St Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 1974. (The hesychast tradition revived through the Philokalic literature.)
  • Stanton, Leonard J. The Optina Pustyn Monastery in the Russian Literary Imagination. New York: Peter Lang, 1995. (The Paisian inheritance at Optina and its publishing program.)