Section 07: Exegesis and Polemic

This section turns from the controversialist to the writer, recovering the Cyril whose life’s dominant labour was the interpretation of Scripture and the defence of the faith. Its first file surveys the vast exegetical corpus — the Commentary on John (anti-Arian, with the seeds of the eucharistic theology of the life-giving flesh), the Commentary on Luke surviving largely in Syriac, the two great Pentateuch works of Alexandrian typology, and the prophetic commentaries — almost all of it written before 428 and anti-Arian rather than anti-Nestorian in thrust, read with Robert Wilken’s caution about its entanglement with Cyril’s theology and his stance toward Judaism. Its second file treats Against Julian, Cyril’s apologetic refutation of the emperor Julian the Apostate’s lost Against the Galileans, the chief surviving witness to that work and the most extensive Christian reply to pagan polemic since Origen’s Contra Celsum.

Tradition: Pan-Orthodox (Church Father)

Contents

File Title Scope
the-biblical-commentaries.md The Biblical Commentaries The scale and pre-428, anti-Arian character of the exegetical corpus; the Commentary on John (consubstantiality of the Son, the lost books 7–8, the eucharistic seeds of John 6); the Commentary on Luke (Syriac survival, festal/pastoral); the Pentateuch works (On Adoration and Worship in Spirit and in Truth and the Glaphyra) and Alexandrian typology — the “mystery of Christ” in the Law; Isaiah and the Twelve Prophets; the character of Cyril’s method (theoria, the Christological centre) and Wilken’s caution about its entanglement with his theology and his stance toward Judaism.
against-julian.md Against Julian The apologetic Contra Julianum; Julian the Apostate and his lost Against the Galileans (362–363); the dedication to Theodosius II; the 20-book/4-pentad structure, books I–X complete in Greek; the disputed dating (traditional late-430s/440s vs. Vinzent’s c. 424); its value as the chief witness to Julian’s lost work and the Contra Celsum comparison; the argument on Hellenism, the Law, and the Gospel; its place in Cyril’s wider apologetic and polemical output.

How to Use

  • Read The Biblical Commentaries first. It establishes the dominant, pre-controversy labour of Cyril’s life and the anti-Arian, Christological-typological method that frames everything else in his output — including the eucharistic exegesis taken up in Section 08.
  • Then read Against Julian, the one major turn outward against paganism, which stands apart from both the exegetical and the controversial corpus and is best read against the backdrop of the commentaries’ typological reading of the Law.
  • Throughout, note the disciplines of the compendium: Cyril is cited by work, division, verified PG column, CPG number, and translation; contested datings (above all the date of Against Julian) are flagged as disputed rather than resolved.

Cross-References

References

Full primary- and secondary-source citations are given at the foot of each content file. The principal primary texts are Cyril’s Commentary on John (PG 73–74; CPG 5208), Commentary on Luke (PG 72; CPG 5207, from the Syriac), On Adoration and Worship in Spirit and in Truth (PG 68; CPG 5200), the Glaphyra (PG 69; CPG 5201), the commentaries on Isaiah (PG 70; CPG 5203) and the Twelve Prophets (PG 71–72; CPG 5204), and Against Julian (PG 76:489–1064; CPG 5233). The governing secondary works are McGuckin, Russell, Wilken, and Hill (FC translations).