03 — The Mission to the Picts

The mission for which a later age named Columba “apostle to the Picts”: the journey from Iona up the Great Glen to the fortress of King Bridei mac Maelchon near Inverness, the contests of holy power with Bridei’s magus Broichan, the gate of the royal stronghold reported to open of itself, and — on the way there — the encounter at the River Ness that would become, fifteen hundred years later, the earliest written anchor of the “Loch Ness Monster” tradition. These files narrate Adomnán’s account precisely, pin every wonder to him by book and chapter, and take seriously a nuance the Vita itself imposes: that Adomnán nowhere narrates a mass conversion of the Pictish nation, nor clearly even the baptism of Bridei, and that the “apostle to the Picts” framing partly outruns what the source actually claims.

Tradition: Pan-Orthodox (pre-Schism; Celtic; apostle to the Picts)

The Pictish mission is the most historically consequential episode of Columba’s life and, at the same time, one of the most carefully shaped in the telling. North and east of the Druim Alban — the spine of mountains dividing the Gaelic west of Britain from the lands of the Picts — lay a people whom Bede, writing a generation after Adomnán, distinguished into two: the southern Picts, converted (he says) long before by Ninian, and the northern Picts, converted by Columba (Bede, HE 3.4; trans. Colgrave & Mynors 1969). It is on Bede’s authority above all that Columba is remembered as the apostle of the northern Picts, and the title has stuck.

Adomnán’s Vita Columbae, a century older than Bede in its events and itself written c. 697, tells a more reticent story. It places Columba at the fortress of Bridei (Brude) mac Maelchon, a powerful king of the northern Picts whose seat lay near the Ness, in the region of Inverness; it narrates that Columba needed an interpreter to preach to the Picts (VC 2.32), that he matched and overcame the king’s magus Broichan in a series of contests (VC 2.33–34), and that the bolts of the closed royal gate drew back of their own accord before him (VC 2.35). But it does not narrate the baptism of Bridei, and it does not describe the conversion of the Pictish people as an event. The disjunction between what Bede asserts and what Adomnán records is one of the genuine source-critical problems of the dossier, and these files keep it in view throughout (see Bridei and the Northern Picts).

The second file treats the single most famous paragraph Adomnán ever wrote: the beast in the River Ness (VC 2.27). It is the earliest written notice ever pressed into the service of the modern Loch Ness legend — and it concerns the river, not the loch, and is told not to record a sighting of an animal but to display the power of Christ over a deadly beast at the saint’s word, with the heathen Picts present moved to glorify the Christian God. Per METHODOLOGY §3.5 it is reported here as what the Vita attests, pinned to its chapter, and the modern popular appropriation is set beside it soberly (see The Loch Ness Episode).

Files in This Section

File Description
Bridei and the Northern Picts The journey up the Great Glen to the fortress of Bridei mac Maelchon near Inverness; the interpreter and the question of the Pictish language (VC 2.32); the contests with the magus Broichan over a captive Irish slave-girl and over the weather (VC 2.33–34); the bolts of the royal gate drawing back of themselves (VC 2.35); and the source-critical nuance — Bede credits Columba with converting the northern Picts (HE 3.4), but Adomnán narrates neither Bridei’s baptism nor a national conversion, so that the “apostle to the Picts” framing partly outruns the Vita.
The Loch Ness Episode Adomnán’s account of the water beast in the River Ness (VC 2.27): the man it had killed and was being buried, Columba sending Lugne Mocumin to swim the river, the beast’s rush, the sign of the cross and the command in Christ’s name, the flight “as if dragged back by ropes,” and the heathen onlookers glorifying God. The story pinned to Adomnán as a miracle of holy power and conversion per METHODOLOGY §3.5 — and the modern “Loch Ness Monster” appropriation (river vs. loch; 1934 onward) assessed soberly as reception, not as the text’s concern.

See Also

References

  • Adomnán of Iona. Life of St Columba (Vita Sancti Columbae). Trans. Richard Sharpe. London: Penguin Classics, 1995. (Translation with introduction and notes; the Pictish material at VC 1.37, 2.27, 2.32, 2.33–35, 2.42.)
  • Anderson, Alan Orr, and Marjorie Ogilvie Anderson, eds. Adomnán’s Life of Columba. Rev. ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991. (The standard critical edition of the Latin text.)
  • Bede. Ecclesiastical History of the English People. Ed. and trans. Bertram Colgrave and R. A. B. Mynors. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1969. (HE 3.4 on Columba and the northern Picts, Ninian and the southern Picts.)
  • Herbert, Máire. Iona, Kells, and Derry: The History and Hagiography of the Monastic Familia of Columba. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988.
  • Clancy, Thomas Owen. “The Real St Ninian.” The Innes Review 52 (2001): 1–28; and Clancy, Thomas Owen, and Gilbert Márkus. Iona: The Earliest Poetry of a Celtic Monastery. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1995.