The Holy Mysteries (Sacraments)
In Orthodox theology, the term “Mystery” (Greek: mysterion; Russian: tainstvo; Church Slavonic: tainstvo) is preferred over the Latin “sacrament” (sacramentum). The Mysteries are genuine encounters with Christ in and through the life of the Church — real participations in divine grace, not mere symbols or memorials. While the Orthodox Church traditionally recognizes seven principal Mysteries, she has never dogmatically limited the number to seven, and the very enumeration of seven arose under Western influence.
Tradition: Pan-Orthodox
Terminology: Mystery vs. Sacrament
The Greek word mysterion (from myo, “to close the lips,” hence a secret or hidden reality) carries richer theological connotations than the Latin sacramentum (originally a Roman military oath or legal bond). In Orthodox usage, mysterion emphasizes the hidden, divine reality that is communicated through visible, material means. The entire life of the Church is, in a sense, a mystery — the liturgy, the icons, the preaching of the Word, and the whole sacramental economy are all modes by which the divine life is communicated to humanity.
Fr. Alexander Schmemann writes: “The first, the basic definition of man is that he is the priest. He stands in the center of the world and unifies it in his act of blessing God, of both receiving the world from God and offering it to God… The world was created as the ‘matter,’ the material of one all-embracing eucharist, and man was created as the priest of this cosmic sacrament” (Schmemann, For the Life of the World, ch. 1, p. 15).
The Number Seven
The enumeration of exactly seven sacraments entered Orthodox theology relatively late, primarily through Western scholastic influence:
- In the West, the number seven was fixed by Peter Lombard (12th century) and dogmatically defined at the Council of Florence (1439) and the Council of Trent (1547).
- In the East, the earliest known enumeration of exactly seven is commonly traced to the Latin-framed Profession of Faith of Emperor Michael VIII Palaiologos accepted at the Second Council of Lyons (1274); the sevenfold list was then consolidated in the 17th-century confessions — the Orthodox Confession of Metropolitan Peter Mogila (1640) and the Confession of Dositheus (1672) — both composed in dialogue with (and partly in reaction to) Western theology. The precise channels of adoption remain debated among scholars.
- Orthodox theologians of the 20th-century patristic revival (Florovsky, Schmemann, Meyendorff) have noted that the ancient Church did not limit the Mysteries to a fixed number. Dionysius the Areopagite, in The Ecclesiastical Hierarchy, treats six rites: baptism (illumination), the synaxis (Eucharist), the consecration of the myron, ordination, monastic consecration, and the funeral rites; other Fathers list different numbers. The insistence on exactly seven is a Western import, not an ancient Orthodox tradition.
Nevertheless, the seven principal Mysteries as commonly listed in Orthodox theology are:
- Baptism (Kreschenie / Baptisma)
- Chrismation (Miropomazanie / Chrisma)
- The Eucharist (Evkharistiya / Eucharistia)
- Confession / Repentance (Pokayanie / Metanoia)
- Marriage (Venchanie / Gamos)
- Holy Orders (Svyaschenstvo / Cheirotonia)
- Holy Unction (Eleosvyashcheniye / Euchelaion)
Some Orthodox theologians and liturgical texts also regard the following as having a sacramental or mysteriological character: monastic tonsure, the blessing of water (Theophany), the funeral service, the consecration of a church, and others.
Orthodox vs. Western Sacramental Theology
Distinction from Roman Catholic Sacramental Theology
Roman Catholic sacramental theology, especially as developed by the scholastics, analyzes sacraments in terms of matter (materia) and form (forma) — the material element (water, bread, wine, oil) and the verbal formula that gives it sacramental meaning. The sacrament is “valid” when the correct matter and form are used by a properly ordained minister with the correct intention.
Orthodox theology does not reject the concepts of matter and form entirely, but it regards this analytical framework as excessively juridical and mechanistic. In the Orthodox understanding:
- The Mysteries are ecclesial events, not isolated ritual acts. They take place within the community of the Church, in the context of the liturgical assembly.
- The emphasis is on the invocation of the Holy Spirit (epiclesis), not merely on the precise verbal formula.
- The whole prayer of the Church effects the Mystery, not a single “moment of consecration” that can be isolated with scholastic precision.
- The Mysteries are not “caused” by the minister’s power but are acts of Christ Himself, working through the Holy Spirit in the Church.
(Schmemann, For the Life of the World, ch. 3; Meyendorff, Byzantine Theology, ch. 15)
Distinction from Protestant “Ordinances”
Most Protestant traditions (with some exceptions, notably Lutheranism and some Anglican traditions) understand baptism and the Lord’s Supper as ordinances — symbolic acts of obedience commanded by Christ, which testify to grace already received through faith but do not themselves communicate grace. The elements are memorials or signs, not vehicles of divine life.
Orthodox theology rejects this view entirely. The Mysteries truly communicate the grace of God — they are genuine encounters with Christ, not mere symbols or memorials. The bread and wine truly become the Body and Blood of Christ; the baptismal water truly effects regeneration; the anointing with Holy Myron truly imparts the Holy Spirit. This is not magic but the faithful action of God in response to the prayer of the Church and the faith of the recipient.
The Mysteries as Encounters with Christ
Fr. Schmemann’s fundamental insight is that the Mysteries are not discrete “things” dispensed by the Church but are modes of encounter with the living Christ:
“In the Orthodox ecclesial experience and tradition a sacrament is understood primarily as a revelation of the genuine nature of creation, of the world, which, however much it has fallen as ‘this world,’ will remain God’s world, awaiting salvation, redemption, healing and transfiguration in a new earth and a new heaven” (Schmemann, The Eucharist: Sacrament of the Kingdom, ch. 2 — not, as often cited, For the Life of the World).
The Mysteries presuppose and manifest the Church — they cannot exist apart from the ecclesial community. It is the whole Church that baptizes, that celebrates the Eucharist, that marries, that ordains. The priest or bishop acts not in his own person but as the minister of Christ in the midst of the assembled people of God.
Contents of This Section
- Baptism and Chrismation — Initiation into the Body of Christ
- The Holy Eucharist — The Mystery of the Body and Blood of Christ
- Confession (Repentance) — The Mystery of Repentance
- Marriage — The Mystery of Crowning
- Holy Orders — The threefold ordained ministry
- Holy Unction — The Mystery of Anointing of the Sick
See Also
- The Holy Mysteries — the full compendium: each of the seven mysteries with its Scripture, theology, and history
- The Niceno-Constantinopolitan Creed
- Theosis
- Icons and Iconoclasm
References
- Schmemann, Alexander. For the Life of the World: Sacraments and Orthodoxy. Crestwood: SVS Press, 1973.
- Schmemann, Alexander. The Eucharist: Sacrament of the Kingdom. Crestwood: SVS Press, 1988.
- Dionysius the Areopagite. The Ecclesiastical Hierarchy (trans. Luibheid, Pseudo-Dionysius: The Complete Works, Paulist Press, 1987).
- Profession of Faith of Emperor Michael VIII Palaiologos, Second Council of Lyons (1274).
- Schmemann, Alexander. Of Water and the Spirit: A Liturgical Study of Baptism. Crestwood: SVS Press, 1974.
- Meyendorff, John. Byzantine Theology: Historical Trends and Doctrinal Themes. New York: Fordham University Press, 1974.
- Pomazansky, Michael. Orthodox Dogmatic Theology. Platina: St. Herman of Alaska Brotherhood, 1994.
- Ware, Kallistos. The Orthodox Church. London: Penguin, 1993.
- Peter Mogila. Orthodox Confession of the Catholic and Apostolic Eastern Church (1640).
- Dositheus, Patriarch of Jerusalem. Confession of Dositheus (1672).